Blog

  • HEARTBREAKING : Strictly’s Amy Dowden Breaks Silence After Sh0ck Axe — Her Shocking Revelation Exposes a Hidden Struggle No One Saw Coming

    HEARTBREAKING : Strictly’s Amy Dowden Breaks Silence After Sh0ck Axe — Her Shocking Revelation Exposes a Hidden Struggle No One Saw Coming

    Strictly

    Strictly pro Amy Dowden made a heartbreaking confession (Image: BBC)

    Strictly Come Dancing professional Amy Dowden made a heartbreaking confession as she became part of the first couple to be eliminated from the BBC dance competition this year, alongside her celebrity partner Thomas Skinner. The pair danced off against Chris Robshaw and Nadiya Bychkova and were unanimously eliminated by the judges, all of whom voted to save Chris and Nadiya.

    The judges’ scores were added to those from the first live show last week – which didn’t include a public vote element – and combined with this week’s public voting to decide the lowest scores. During the dance-off, Thomas and Amy had to perform their Salsa to Dizzee Rascal’s Bonkers, while Chris and Nadiya performed a Viennese Waltz to Lady Gaga and Bruno Mars’ duet Die With a Smile.

    But when the couple spoke to presenter Tess Daly after the dance-off, Amy made a heartbreaking admission.

    She said: “I’ve got to know the real Tom, and he is adorable. He’s looked after me. We’ve laughed so much. We’ve worked so hard and a glitterball would have been amazing but what I’ve learnt in the last few years is happiness, health and being alive is more important than anything. I’ve made a new friend for life and I wouldn’t change a thing.

    “There is a Ballroom boy in there so I’m a bit gutted he didn’t get to do the Ballroom, but the last three years as you know have been quite difficult for me.

    Get the breaking showbiz news first, sent straight to your phone Join us on WhatsApp

    Our community members are treated to special offers, promotions, and adverts from us and our partners. You can check out at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

    Strictly Amy Thomas

    Thomas was the first celeb to be eliminated (Image: BBC)

    “I lost all confidence as a dancer – but walking into the room with you with a massive smile and a laugh, you brought me back and, honestly, thank you.”

    Tom, meanwhile, said: “I’ve loved it. I’ve never danced before and my stay was short, but Amy’s amazing. It’s been great fun and I’ve enjoyed it. I can’t really dance that well but I’ve had fun!

    “Thank you, Amy – sorry that we haven’t done too good, ‘cause you’re a different class.”

    Invalid email

    We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and to improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and 3rd parties based on our understanding. You can unsubscribe at any time. Read our Privacy Policy

  • TRAGIC DISCOVERY: Stacey Solomon breaks silence saying “very heartbreaking” about her family

    TRAGIC DISCOVERY: Stacey Solomon breaks silence saying “very heartbreaking” about her family

    Stacey and her daughter Rose share the same birthday

    Photo of Stacey Solomon at the National Television Awards last month

    View Image

    Stacey Solomon attended the National Television Awards last month(Image: 2025 Getty Images)

    Stacey Solomon has spent time with her second youngest daughter Rose, as they celebrated their birthdays together. The mum and daughter share the same birth date and yesterday, they took a trip into London to mark the occasion in style.

    Sharing clips from the day to her Instagram account, Stacey told followers: “Had the best birthday day out with my birthday twin. What a special day Rose, I love you so much it hurts.” The video was of short clips of the day, from going to Harrods to eating dinner in the Shard and exploring the city together.

    Reflecting on the day further, the former X Factor star said: “I can’t cope with this video. We decided to treat ourselves & have a day in London together for our birthday, it was THE BEST.”

    She continued: “Rose your happiness & joy fills my soul. And sharing a birthday with you is EVERYTHING. Thank you for the best day little one. Happy 4 years. To the moon & back.”

    Stacey is the proud mum to five children. Born in 2008, Zachary is Stacey’s firstborn. She shares the 17-year-old with her ex-partner, Dean Cox. At 13, Leighton is Stacey’s second oldest and the son she shares with ex-partner Aaron Barnham.

    Rex is Stacey and Joe Swash’s first child together, he was born in 2019. Rose, who celebrates her birthday with her mum, is the couple’s first daughter together and was born in 2021, and born in 2023, Belle is the youngest of the children.

    We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. More info

    Stacey likes to share heartfelt messages on social media to celebrate her children’s birthdays. Last year, when Rose turned three, Stacey wrote: “You truly are the best birthday gift I could have ever dreamed of. You light up our lives more than you’ll ever know.”

    Sharing the reason behind Rose’s name, the former X Factor star added: “We loved Autumn. But the initials didn’t work, and then every evening after she was born, the sun went down right outside her window, so I’d watch it set from in there, and it always shone on her mobile and lit up the rose. That’s when we knew she was our Rose.”

    Stacey has a large social media following of over six million people. Many fans of the TV star left messages after the heartwarming family update yesterday. One follower said: “What a special mummy and Rose birthday.”

    A second follower added: “What an amazing day, perfect mummy and daughter memories” and others commented “How magical! What an amazing memory to have made together” and “What a cute little memory with little Rose! Her face says everything.”

    The 36-year-old has appeared on our screens regularly through the years after she shot to fame on The X Factor in 2009. The TV star is married to former EastEnders actor Joe Swash, 43. It has been a busy couple of weeks for Stacey as she attended the National Television Awards, and was nominated for two awards.

    The release of her fly-on-the-wall documentary series with Joe Swash also came last month on BBC, on the back of the success of the first series.

  • “Meghan Markle’s Paris Tears: Genuine Breakdown or Carefully Staged Redemption?”

    “Meghan Markle’s Paris Tears: Genuine Breakdown or Carefully Staged Redemption?”

    Paris Fashion Week turned into a spectacle of whispers and camera flashes when Meghan Markle, the Duchess of Sussex, unexpectedly broke down in tears in front of photographers and attendees. The moment was fleeting but unforgettable, and it immediately set social media alight. Fans, journalists, and royal watchers scrambled to interpret what had just happened. Some wondered if this was a carefully orchestrated stunt to draw attention in a world that often seems to overlook her, while others argued that the Duchess was showing genuine vulnerability under the intense pressure of public scrutiny. The duality of Meghan’s public persona — confident, stylish, and poised — versus the private, human side caught in a moment of apparent distress captivated audiences worldwide.

    According to insider accounts, Meghan had been feeling the weight of scrutiny long before her appearance at Paris Fashion Week. As a former actress turned member of the British royal family, she has always navigated a delicate balance between personal expression and the expectations imposed by the media and the monarchy. The fashion event, usually a celebration of glamour, quickly became a stage where Meghan’s emotional reality collided with public perception. Those who were present noted that after the brief display of emotion, she swiftly composed herself, regaining the poise and grace that have become her signature. Yet, despite the quick recovery, the cameras caught a subtle sadness in her eyes, a fleeting expression that fueled endless speculation online.

    Reactions across social media were immediate and polarized. Hashtags referencing Meghan’s tearful moment trended worldwide, with fans dissecting every frame and gesture. One faction of observers claimed the tears were a strategic move, a way to garner empathy from a public that can be notoriously fickle. They suggested that in a world dominated by relentless media cycles, even a moment of vulnerability could serve as a form of subtle influence. Conversely, another group of viewers insisted that the emotion was authentic, reflecting the very human experience of pressure, loneliness, and the constant gaze of global attention. These conflicting interpretations only heightened the intrigue surrounding the Duchess, keeping her at the center of conversation for days after the event.

    Beyond the moment itself, Meghan’s behavior in the minutes that followed offered further clues for observers. She continued to engage with the fashion world confidently, walking the runway and interacting with designers with her usual elegance. However, the brief tearful episode lingered in the minds of fans and media alike, prompting discussions about the inner emotional struggles faced by someone living life under constant scrutiny. Some royal enthusiasts speculated that the incident revealed Meghan’s need for acknowledgment and support, while others framed it as a calculated performance, carefully timed to coincide with a high-profile event.

    What is undeniable is that the moment resonated across audiences and demographics, sparking debates about the intersection of celebrity, royalty, and emotional expression. Meghan’s tears became a symbol — whether of human vulnerability, strategic image management, or a combination of both — that reminded the world of the complexities behind the Duchess’s public life. Every social media post, news article, and fan discussion reinforced her status as a figure whose actions, however brief or subtle, could ignite global conversations.

    In the end, Meghan Markle’s tearful moment at Paris Fashion Week was more than a fleeting episode; it was a reminder of the pressure, scrutiny, and expectations that come with living a life in the public eye. Whether a calculated act or a genuine display of emotion, the incident reaffirmed her influence and presence in both the fashion world and the global consciousness. The images, captured and shared endlessly online, continue to provoke debate, curiosity, and fascination, cementing the Duchess’s ability to captivate, mystify, and inspire audiences around the world.

  • ‘It’s Been Brutal!’ — Rylan Clark Breaks Silence On “Witch Hunt” And Misogyny That Nearly Broke Him

    ‘It’s Been Brutal!’ — Rylan Clark Breaks Silence On “Witch Hunt” And Misogyny That Nearly Broke Him

     

    Rylan Clark and Alice Roberts front The Witches of Essex

    View 2 Images

    Rylan Clark and Alice Roberts front The Witches of Essex(Image: Sky HISTORY)

    Rylan Clark is turning his lifelong passion for history into a deep dive into witchcraft as he fronts The Witches Of Essex. It’s a subject that’s fascinated him since childhood.

    Article continues below

    “It started at primary school. I was obsessed with history and the Tudors. I remember it all so vividly,” says Rylan Clark. “Things like witchcraft were spoken about but not in detail, and I didn’t realise what a big thing it was.”

    Now, in three gripping episodes, Rylan revisits three witch hunts that define British history’s darkest chapters. And he was stunned to discover the story hit far closer to home than he ever expected.

    But the more he dug, the more Rylan realised what could really be the root cause of the witch hunts – and a disturbing pattern emerged. “You could have a big nose and be called a witch, it’s that simple, it’s so ridiculous,” he says.

    “You could have a disability, you could have a birthmark. If you had a pet, it was called a familiar and you could accuse someone’s pet of completing witchcraft on their behalf. It was anything and everything. If people didn’t like you and wanted you gone, you were a witch.”

    Rylan’s outrage sharpened when he learnt about Matthew Hopkins, Witchfinder General in the 1640s. “This man was given the run of Essex to say whatever he wanted, get away with it and women were killed because of him.

    We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. More info

    His book became the manual for persecution of women, which then went to America. It makes you angry that someone had the audacity to say a person should be killed, and people went along with it,” Rylan says.

    Hopkins’ authority, he continues, was almost cult-like. “He was very powerful and many people treated him like a god. It felt like a cult,” Rylan says.

    “The government and royals let him do what he wanted. When you give someone that power, they will use it.” Hopkins’ legacy stretched across the Atlantic, influencing the Salem witch trials in Massachusetts, where 19 people were executed by hanging.

    Article continues below

    The punishments, however, were what haunted Rylan the most. “To find out if you were a witch, they would dunk you in a river. If you drowned, you weren’t a witch but you were dead. If you survived, you were a witch and then hanged. It was crazy,” he says.

    Rylan has no doubt about the root cause of the witch trials. “Misogyny played a massive part in it and it’s still prevalent today,” he says. “A lot of it boils down to that in the 1600s men ran everything, and women were pushed into the background.”

    Rylan Clark teams up with professor Alice Roberts as they dive deep into the causes of the witch hunts in Britain

    View 2 Images

    Rylan Clark teams up with professor Alice Roberts as they dive deep into the causes of the witch hunts in Britain(Image: Sky HISTORY)

    Article continues below

    “Whenever I thought about witchcraft I always thought of Salem, but actually Essex is the original, and the reason Salem happened was because of Essex,” he says. “I’m an Essex boy, I didn’t realise half the stuff happened 20 minutes from my house!”

    The series charts centuries of fear and paranoia. In the show’s opening episode, Rylan rewinds to the early years of Queen Elizabeth I’s reign, when an Act of Parliament made witchcraft a felony punishable by death.

    In episode two, he reopens a chilling cold case from 1582, when state-sponsored violence against suspected witches swept across England. In the finale, he then investigates the witchcraft hysteria during the English Civil War. But he’s not tackling these stories alone.

    Article continues below

    Joining him is Professor Alice Roberts, whose expertise and quick rapport added to the spark on set. “Pretty soon into the shoot we realised that we could be ourselves,” Rylan says.

    “Like when Alice does a deep dive into something and I’d yawn at her and go, ‘It’s not that deep.’ We just got each other’s personalities.” Their dynamic was just as playful off-camera. “I definitely pulled her out of her comfort zone at times,” Rylan says.

    Together, the pair welcome a string of specialists to piece together the truth of what really happened to those accused of witchcraft. For Rylan, the partnership with these experts became as personal as it was professional.

    Article continues below

    “It was majorly important for me personally as well as Alice,” Rylan says. “Alice knew a lot about what the experts were talking about, but I didn’t, so I asked questions.”

    Still, they never lost sight of the seriousness at the heart of the subject matter. “There are fun moments and some Rylan-isms where we have the odd joke.

    But what works is Alice doesn’t necessarily believe in witchcraft. I’m more open to believing something,” he says. “But ultimately we both just want answers and to know why this happened.”

  • EXCLUSIVE: I worked with Rylan Clark and he showed his true colours within minutes

    EXCLUSIVE: I worked with Rylan Clark and he showed his true colours within minutes

    EXCLUSIVE: I worked with Rylan Clark and he showed his true colours within minutes

    Dating Naked

    Reality TV star Luke Worley opened up about working with Rylan Clark, revealing what the presenter is really like in real life. Luke recently returned to screens on Paramount+ series Dating Nak3d, two years after his appearance on Married at First Sight. The controversial show, hosted by Rylan, features fully unclothed participants as they search for love — and compete for a £50,000 prize. In an interview with Express Online, Luke praised Rylan, highlighting how he never acted superior to the cast and helped put everyone at ease during filming.

    The TV star said: “He’s a good guy. He’s no different from anyone else, and he puts people at ease. Dating Nak3d is the perfect show for Rylan, and as the seasons go on, hoping that next year’s is commissioned, I think you’ll see him come out of his shell even more. There are points where, if he had full free rein in what he’s saying and doing, it could be even better.” Luke admitted he respects Rylan for being unapologetically honest and not worrying about others’ opinions.

    2024 BAFTA Television Awards With P&O Cruises - Special Access Arrivals

    He continued: “What I respect about Rylan is that he does say his opinion. He doesn’t care what people think, like with what happened to him recently on This Morning. He’s open and honest in what he says and I’m quite similar to that, so I relate to him on that. He’s the same as all of us there. He didn’t make us feel any lesser than him and made us feel so comfortable.”

    He believes Rylan is perfect for the show’s cheeky and controversial style, adding: “I got to speak to him a few times because I got kicked out twice. We’re both from Essex so we had a bit in common.

    “Overall, he is perfect for that type of show. It’s a bit tongue and cheek and controversial. It can sway opinions but that is his personality. He’s a bit like marmite and I think the show is too.”

    Luke added: “I can see it getting better and better as the seasons go on.”

    Despite being extremely nervous at the start, Luke advised others to focus on themselves during that first day, after which being naked starts to feel completely normal.

    He said: “Remember everyone is in the same boat. For me, I was so nervous. You don’t get to see it because it’s off camera but I was pacing for hours on end in this room. I didn’t stop pacing. It takes you a good day to adjust.

    “My advice would be: get through that first day with your head down. Don’t worry about anything but yourself. After that, the rest gets so much easier. It’s like it’s normal to be naked.”

    Luke saw Dating Nak3d a chance to show his true self, something he felt he wasn’t able to do on MAFS due to the way it was edited. Luke admitted he wouldn’t recommend MAFS to his “worst enemy” and believes the editing process should be “illegal”.

    In contrast, Luke had nothing but praise for the behind-the-scenes team on Dating Nak3d.

    “Everyone at Dating Nak3d was unbelievable. All of the welfare team, I could name all of them, they were so good. If you ever needed anything, they would help you because they want to keep you at ease,” he said. “It was a really really good experience from the back end side of it to what you see on TV, it is what you saw and everyone was so comfortable.”

    While Luke has stepped away from reality dating shows for the time being, he has two upcoming TV projects in the pipeline. He also expressed interest in joining Big Brother, admitting it’s a show he’s dreamed of being part of since childhood.

    Alongside his television work, which he considers more of a hobby, Luke has shifted his focus to business and currently runs his own telecoms company.

  • “Farage Fever: How Keir Starmer’s Labour Became Obsessed with Its Own Nemesis”

    “Farage Fever: How Keir Starmer’s Labour Became Obsessed with Its Own Nemesis”

    Reform within touching distance of Labour as poll suggests 'new era' for British politics - A new poll for Sky News by YouGov puts Nigel Farage's party just one percentage point behind

    It was supposed to be an era of calm after chaos. Keir Starmer entered Downing Street promising competence, unity, and a government that would “tread more lightly” on people’s lives. Yet barely a year into office, Labour appears to have developed a strange, almost compulsive fixation — not with its own policies, not with governing, but with Nigel Farage. The Reform UK leader, once dismissed as a p0litical sideshow, has become a ghost haunting every corner of Westminster. Every speech, every policy, every defensive press briefing seems to carry the same unspoken refrain: What will Farage say?

    The irony is unmistakable. Labour won power promising to end years of populist disruption, yet it is now governed by the same spectre it sought to exorcise. Farage, without a single seat in Parliament, has achieved something extraordinary — shaping the national conversation from the outside. Whether it’s immigration, identity, or the culture wars, his shadow looms over Starmer’s Cabinet meetings like an unwelcome guest who refuses to leave. In a country exhausted by ᵖᵒˡⁱᵗⁱᶜˢ, Farage has mastered the art of turning exhaustion into outrage — and outrage into influence.

    This “Farage Fever” gripping Labour is not entirely irrational. Reform UK’s poll numbers have surged in recent months, eating away at the remains of the Conservative vote while nibbling at Labour’s Red Wall heartlands. Voters in the Midlands and the North, who once turned to Labour out of frustration with the Tories, now find Farage’s rhetoric on sovereignty, freedom, and “common sense ᵖᵒˡⁱᵗⁱᶜˢ” strangely appealing. In pubs, factories, and social media feeds, his soundbites resonate with a wearied electorate who no longer trust traditional elites. Farage doesn’t need power to be powerful; he only needs attention — and Labour keeps giving it to him.

    Nigel Farage's brutal five-takedown of Keir Starmer's new Cabinet | Politics | News | Express.co.uk

    The government’s response has been predictable ut clumsy. Each new Reform rally is met with a Starmer soundbite denouncing “divisive ᵖᵒˡⁱᵗⁱᶜˢ.” Each Farage interview triggers a Labour counter-message about “stability and respect.” Yet in trying so hard to prove they are not like Farage, Labour often ends up amplifying his message. Every denunciation becomes free publicity; every rebuttal confirms his relevance. What began as a campaign of moral contrast has morphed into a battle of obsession — one that Labour cannot seem to escape.

    Behind this obsession lies a deeper insecurity. Labour’s electoral strength rests not on passion but on exhaustion — the sense that Starmer is a safer pair of hands after a decade of Conservative chaos. But safety is not inspiration, and stability alone cannot fill the vacuum of belief. Farage thrives in that vacuum, speaking the language of rebellion while Labour speaks the language of bureaucracy. To the disillusioned voter, one sounds human; the other, hollow. By treating Farage as an ever-present threat, Labour accidentally validates his claim to be the true voice of dissent.

    Keir Starmer's Incompetence Is Pushing Voters into Nigel Farage's Arms

    Yet there is danger in underestimating how corrosive this dynamic can become. A government obsessed with its opponents loses sight of its purpose. Rather than defining the p0litical landscape, it becomes reactive — always responding, never leading. When immigration policy is shaped primarily to “outflank Farage,” or when speeches about patriotism are drafted merely to neutralize him, Labour ceases to act from conviction. It governs in the shadow of fear, not vision.

    To escape this spiral, Starmer must rediscover the confidence that brought him to power. Instead of chasing Farage’s ghosts, he must confront the realities that fuel them — the sense of economic stagnation, cultural alienation, and distrust in institutions that Reform UK has so effectively weaponised. The solution to populism is not outrage management; it is relevance. Voters don’t need another argument about Farage. They need a reason to believe in something else.

    Farage will, of course, continue to provoke. That is his genius. But Labour must resist the temptation to turn every provocation into a moral crusade. The more it does, the more it feeds the very narrative it wants to destroy — the idea that the establishment is obsessed with silencing the people’s champion. A government secure in its mission does not chase every headline. It governs.

    For now, though, the fever rages on. Farage sits comfortably outside Westminster, grinning as ministers invoke his name more often than their own policies. Starmer, once the symbol of steady leadership, risks becoming a man forever reacting to a ghost. And in that sense, perhaps Nigel Farage has already won — not by conquering Parliament, but by colonising the p0litical imagination of his enemies.

  • BREAKINGNEWSFormer Loose Women star Saira Khan makes SCATHING COMMENTS about flag-raisers that spark outrage

    BREAKINGNEWSFormer Loose Women star Saira Khan makes SCATHING COMMENTS about flag-raisers that spark outrage

    BREAKINGNEWSFormer Loose Women star Saira Khan makes SCATHING COMMENTS about flag-raisers that spark outrage

    loose women

    Former Loose Women star Saira Khan’s fiery comments about flag-raisers have sparked backlash (Image: ITV)

    Former Loose Women panellist Saira Khan has come under fire after a fiery appearance on Jeremy Vine’s Channel 5 show on Monday where she branded people who raise the British flag as “saddos who drink a lot”. The 55-year-old sparked fury among viewers as she backed Gary Neville’s controversial claim that “angry, middle-aged white men” are dividing the country. Neville, 50, had shared a video on Linkedin saying Britain’s social tension was “mainly created by angry, middle-aged white men, who know exactly what they’re doing” — a comment that immediately went viral.

    Discussing the clip on Monday’s show, Saira told host Jeremy Vine she “completely agreed” with the footballer and praised him for “talking about topics other people shy away from”. “I really applaud Gary Neville,” she said. “Flying the flag isn’t a problem when it’s for sport or national events, but right now it feels like it’s being used by certain groups to be divisive. I completely agree with him.”

    gary neville

    Gary claimed that ‘angry, middle-aged white men’ are dividing the country (Image: linkedin)

     

    When Jeremy tried to jump in, Saira doubled down. “I saw four men climbing up a ladder putting up flags at a roundabout,” she said.

    “It was 2.30 in the afternoon and I thought, why are you not in a job? Why are you not volunteering somewhere? You’re being a public nuisance and creating a health hazard.”

    The TV panellist went on to say she believed those men “probably drink a lot” and looked “largered up”.

    “I’m sorry, but just by the shape of their bodies — and I don’t care if that sounds controversial — I’m making a judgement on their appearance. They were wearing capes, waving flags, and giving me gestures. I just thought, you’re saddos, absolute saddos.”

    She added: “Where I live, there isn’t a single flag flying and you can’t tell me that means we’re not patriotic.”

    Fellow guest James Max, 55, said he understood Neville’s point but accused him of fuelling division himself.

    “When you start saying this is just angry, middle-aged white men, that’s problematic in itself,” he said. “He’s being as divisive with his words because of how he’s framed his argument.”

    Host Jeremy then remarked: “It’s odd to say these are angry middle-aged white men who are trying to divide us, because the word ‘angry’ suggests they’re not in control of themselves.”

    Saira hit back: “They’re not. If you look at marches or protests, a lot of these men are white, angry and dissatisfied with their own lives. That’s how they let it out.”

    Her comments lit up social media, with many viewers branding her remarks “disgraceful”. One person wrote: “Had to turn it off — couldn’t listen to Saira Khan shouting any longer.”

    Another said: “If people choose the United Kingdom as their home, they shouldn’t have a problem with the flag.”

    A third fumed: “#JeremyVine why can’t your guest just talk instead of shouting and ranting — straight out of the left-wing playbook.”

  • Emmerdale spoilers for next week:  Tease Robert Sugden and Aaron Dingle move forward only for Kev to drop big news, while Cain Dingle spirals as he returns to the village

    Emmerdale spoilers for next week: Tease Robert Sugden and Aaron Dingle move forward only for Kev to drop big news, while Cain Dingle spirals as he returns to the village

    Emmerdale spoilers for next week: Tease Robert Sugden and Aaron Dingle move forward only for Kev to drop big news, while Cain Dingle spirals as he returns to the village

     Emmerdale spoilers tease a discovery and one character spirals

    There’s more big moments ahead on Emmerdale next week, as spoilers tease a discovery and one character spirals.


    There’s the fallout to drama between the Tates and Kings, as Carl King faces questioning by the police after the accusation made against him. As he faces trouble for sending an indecent image of a minor, next week he admits to sharing Clemmie’s picture.


    As the two families continue to clash, Clemmie reveals to Dawn what made her send the photo leaving her feeling guilty. As Dawn tries to reason with Nicola, the latter becomes defensive leading to an argument.

    Aaron decides it's time to move back into the flat

    Soon Nicola learns an admission from her pal Laurel Thomas, while Dawn frets when Joe makes a suggestion. Nicola and Laurel realise they’re out of touch with their children’s online lives and agree to work together to protect their children from online dangers

     

    Meanwhile Dawn finds herself opening up to Joe about her past, detailing how she was coerced into sex work and drug addiction. As she vows to protect Clemmie, what will she do?

    There's more big moments ahead on Emmerdale next week

    Cain returns to the village next week, seemingly failing to find John Sugden. Cain set chase after finding out his son’s killer had fled, but next week he returns home and it’s clear he is not doing well.

    Hitting the bottle and being evasive when asked about John, Cain spirals as he hits self destruct. But is there an update on John? As his wife Moira reminds him of his late father Zak’s anniversary, Cain ignores her.

    Emmerdale spoilers for next week tease Robert Sugden and Aaron Dingle move forward

    As his siblings Sam and Belle visit their dad’s grave, they are left disappointed Cain hasn’t joined them but it’s clear the pair are deeply concerned for their brother. Also next week there’s more Robron drama thanks to newcomer Kev.

    Victoria Sugden is frustrated with her brother Robert after learning he still hasn’t told Aaron Dingle about his secret husband Kev, amid their reunion. Aaron decides it’s time to move back into the flat he shared with killer husband John, and he asks Robert to stay with him, clearly anxious.

    Robert agrees, but this annoys Victoria who reminds her brother what he’s hiding from Aaron. Soon Robert joins Aaron, and the latter is expressing hopes for a fresh start for them.

    Tim accepts the cocaine and offers April vodka

    Aaron doesn’t see Robert cancelling a call from Kev, while things continue to move on between the newly reunited couple. Soon Robert is stunned when Kev drops some big news, so what will Robert do?

    Next week sees Liam Cavanagh find out his test results amid his concern he may have prostate cancer. Finally next week, teens Dylan and April continue to be trapped in Ray and Celia’s drug schemes.


    When Dylan is offered a trial shift at the depot as a driver, elsewhere we see Ray telling Celia it’s part of their plan. Ray pressures Dylan into taking a delivery for him during his Hull trip and he reluctantly agrees, only for him to find out it’s Billy doing the driving not him.

    As for April, she’s alarmed when Ray tells her he’s sending her on a trip to Liverpool, threatening to sell on her debt if she doesn’t comply. When she’s too late accepting the job, Ray reveals he has something else in mind.

     

    Ray drives April to a hotel and gives her cocaine for a ‘valuable client’. But when client Tim accepts the cocaine and offers April vodka, the teen soon finds herself trapped in a bedroom with Tim. Can she get out?

  • BREAKING: ITV daytime shows are set to get a huge shakeup next year as the teams merge behind the scenes and Lorraine and Loose Women get their time on air cut down

    BREAKING: ITV daytime shows are set to get a huge shakeup next year as the teams merge behind the scenes and Lorraine and Loose Women get their time on air cut down

    BREAKING: ITV daytime shows are set to get a huge shakeup next year as the teams merge behind the scenes and Lorraine and Loose Women get their time on air cut down

    Loose Women

    Loose Women have faced yet another shakeup as stars of the hit ITV daytime show prepare for major changes. The daytime scheduling is set to look very different next year as huge cuts sweep the channel.


    From next year, Loose Women will only air for 30 weeks rather than its usual 52, slashing production time almost in half. The beloved live studio audience will also be no more as well as its star-studded guests.


    It is not the only hit show to be affected as Lorraine will instead run for half an hour and for 30 weeks a year. Loose Women, Lorraine and This Morning will move to a shared studio location in Covent Garden where the three shows will be produced by just one team, with 220 jobs set to go.

    Kaye Adams, Oti Mabuse, Nadia Sawalha, Jane Moore

    In another change for Loose Women, its long-time editor Sally Shelford has decided to hang up her reign. Amid her decision to leave, many of the show’s stars are said to be concerned about keeping their spots while the show gets trimmed down.

    Sally’s departure is also said to be a hit to the cast as she “knows the women well” and “who will go on with who”. A source said: “The show is in bits. So many of the panellists need to work on the show to pay the bills so they are facing some tough times.”


    They added to Daily Mail: “There are silos within the show – some despise one another, others are exceptionally close. These are desperate and worrying times.”

    A spokesperson for ITV told the Mirror : “After almost a decade at the helm of Loose Women, winning three Royal Television Society Awards, two BAFTA nominations, launching powerful campaigns and expanding the Loose brand with Loose Men, a successful podcast and a live nationwide tour, Sally feels the time is right to hand the Loose baton on.

    “She will continue as Loose Women Editor until the New Year.” Another huge change for the show will reportedly be the end of A-list guests, who are expected to appear on This Morning instead.


    Over its 25 year history, Loose Women has welcomed some of the world’s biggest stars to the panel – from Naomi Campbell to Janet Jackson and Dame Joan Collins.

    Speaking about the huge cuts, an insider told The Mirror: “It’s not a case of viewers seeing less of their shows… it’s impossible to see how the high standards will remain the same.

    “Some staff believe Loose Women and Lorraine in particular will enter a death spiral… it’s just so sad. Just a handful of people will be working on each of those two programmes which has huge ramifications for how they are going forward.”


    Loose Women’s Nadia Sawalha admitted she was “totally devastated” at the loss of the audience and spoke out in support of her close friend and warm-up artist Lee Peart, who lost his job as a result.

    “The audience is so important for the show,” Nadia said. “What a lot of people don’t realise is that we’re self-employed. Every contract is a new contract – I could be let go tomorrow or in five years. It’s brutal.”

    She added: “Hundreds of people are going to be made redundant out of the blue. A lot of my friends and colleagues on this show and at ITV have been there for decades, and I can’t tell you how upsetting it was to see people walking around numb with shock and fear about what they were going to do.”

  • HEARTBREAKING MOMENT: Big Brother’s Sam Breaks Down After Homophobic Slur Leaves Him Feeling “Utterly Alone” Inside The House

    HEARTBREAKING MOMENT: Big Brother’s Sam Breaks Down After Homophobic Slur Leaves Him Feeling “Utterly Alone” Inside The House

    Big Brother star opens up about 'rude' housemate as formal warning issued

    View 4 Images

    Big Brother star opens up about ‘rude’ housemate as formal warning issued(Image: ITV)

    Big Brother star Sam has opened up about how hurt they were by housemate George’s “rude” and “isolating” impression of him, as the incident leads Big Brother to issue a formal warning.

    Article continues below

    During a game of Truth or Dare, George was asked what he doesn’t like about his fellow housemates, he did an impression of Sam’s voice and body language, using overly exaggerated limp wrists.

    The impression was met with laughs from some of the other boys, while Sam looked shocked and housemate Caroline said: “You could just say camp.”

    Sam was brought to tears

    View 4 Images

    Sam was brought to tears(Image: ITV)

    Later, Sam, who is part of the LGBTQIA community, opened up to Feyisola and said the situation made them feel like they had to be less like themself. In the Diary Room, Sam broke down in tears and explained how he thought the impression was “rude” and felt “isolated” when the other boys laughed.

    “It felt like I was back at school,” he said. “When you’re a bit different, people think it’s okay to take the p*** out of you.”

    We use your sign-up to provide content in ways you’ve consented to and improve our understanding of you. This may include adverts from us and third parties based on our knowledge of you. More info

    Sam was brought to tears again when he confronted George about his behaviour and explained how it was homophobic. George said that wasn’t what he intended, but was later called to the Diary Room and given a formal warning from Big Brother.

    George was given a warning for his impression

    View 4 Images

    George was given a warning for his impression (Image: ITV)

    Fans of the show have called out George’s behaviour and demanded his eviction. “George deserved that warning by Big Brother you could tell how much his mocking upset Sam and it was very malicious and unfair since Sam has been nothing but kind and loving to everyone,” one said.

    Article continues below

    Another added: “We love you Sam! Can we evict George already?” But have slammed the show too. Many were upset that it wasn’t until Sam was visibly upset that Big Brother decided to punish George and that this could have been addressed a whole episode earlier.

    One said: “So, if Sam hadn’t got upset with the comment the morning after, we wouldn’t have heard about it. Retrospectively editing something in from two days ago because you suck at thoroughly editing together a highlights show the first time round. Right.

    “And I’m sure I don’t need to point out that Big Brother did nothing about it until Sam had (at least) two other upset conversations about it *the day after*. Useless.”

    Article continues below

    Big Brother 2025 star George (back) in Heartstopper Season 2 episode 6 'Truth/Dare'

    View 4 Images

    Is this Big Brother 2025 star George (back) in Heartstopper episode Truth/Dare?(Image: Netflix )

    Another added: “Did it really take big brother 24 hours to do anything about George’s behaviour? I miss old big brother where he called the naughty housemates IMMEDIATELY in to the diary room to lay into them”

    A third noticed an element of hypocrisy, as George, who is an actor, appeared in the LGBTQIA teen drama Heartstopper. “I need big brother to reveal that George took a part on Heartstoppers but is okay being a divisive homophobic t***”

    George has already been controversial as he has repeatedly brought up politics with the housemates and made his opinions clear, particularly his view that asylum seekers should stay in France. His opinions and admiration for Nigel Farage have been divisive in the house.