The Lakers could lose LeBron James and another of the NBA’s top stars

Los Angeles faces a defining offseason with its superstar weighing his future

The Los Angeles Lakers are entering one of the most uncertain stretches of their modern era.

With LeBron James approaching the end of his contract and Austin Reaves positioned for a significant raise after a career-best season, the franchise could face a future without both stars anchoring their roster.

LeBron James was stunned by Bryce’s change in appearance

For a team that has built its identity around continuity with LeBron at the center, the months ahead may define whether Los Angeles remains a contender or enters a new cycle of rebuilding.

James, who has openly hinted at frustrations with the Lakers’ inconsistency, holds the option to test free agency at the end of the season.

Sights & Sounds: Allegiant Stadium Open Practice

At 40 years old, he continues to play at an elite level, but the clock is ticking on how long he can remain a centerpiece.

While many expect him to finish his career in Los Angeles, the possibility of him opting out has left the organization bracing for every scenario.

At the same time, Reaves’ emergence adds another layer of complexity. The 26-year-old guard has transformed from a rotation piece into a reliable scorer and playmaker, posting averages of 20.2 points, 4.5 rebounds, and 5.8 assists while shooting nearly 38 percent from beyond the arc.

His rise has made him one of the most attractive young guards on the market and could spark a bidding war once he becomes a free agent.

For Los Angeles, the Reaves question may prove as critical as James’ decision. Because of salary cap limitations, the Lakers may not be able to match the lucrative offers that rival franchises could present.

Reaves’ combination of scoring versatility and improved playmaking makes him a desirable piece for contenders, even as some evaluators note his defensive limitations.

The front office will need to assess whether investing heavily in Reaves fits into a long-term plan, or whether it makes more sense to explore trade options before his value peaks.

Losing him for nothing would be a damaging blow, but moving him could also strip the Lakers of one of their few rising stars.

LeBron’s decision casts a long shadow

While Reaves’ future is complicated, James’ looming decision may be even more consequential. If he opts out, the Lakers would have significant cap space to pursue new talent or reallocate resources toward keeping Reaves.

But replacing James’ production, leadership, and global influence would be nearly impossible.

James’ choice could also influence Reaves directly. If LeBron departs, Reaves might be less inclined to remain with a team entering transition.

If he stays, the Lakers could trade Reaves on the opportunity to compete for championships alongside one of the game’s greatest players.

The Lakers’ predicament reflects the balancing act of building around a superstar near the twilight of his career while also preparing for the next era.

Reaves is the kind of player who could bridge that gap, offering both current production and future potential. Yet the economics of the league suggest Los Angeles may not be able to keep him without significant sacrifices elsewhere on the roster.

Reaves himself has expressed admiration for the Lakers and comfort with his role in Los Angeles, but sentiment may only go so far when teams are prepared to offer him a contract that secures his financial future.

Can the Lakers keep Reaves?

For the Lakers, the decision may not simply be about keeping a fan favorite, but about whether they can construct a sustainable roster with him as part of the foundation.

As the offseason approaches, the Lakers are left with more questions than answers. Can they convince LeBron James to finish his career in Los Angeles?

Can they afford to hold onto Austin Reaves without crippling their flexibility? And if one or both depart, will the franchise pivot quickly to avoid years of mediocrity?

For now, all they can do is wait-knowing that the choices made over the next year could define the Lakers’ direction for the next decade.