Prince Harry’s Bombshell Plan ‘Exposed’ As William And Charles Face Major New Headache
Prince Harry has been accused on TalkTV of “cashing in” on his royal connections as commentators questioned both his reported documentary plans and the timing of his return to Britain.
The Duke of Sussex came under fire during Plank of the Week, where Kevin O’Sullivan claimed Harry had been closely involved with Earl Spencer’s new memoir Swan Song and suggested the Sussexes’ move back to the UK had been timed around the book’s release.
There is no evidence in the material provided that Harry collaborated on the memoir, and the claim was presented by O’Sullivan as his own belief.
TalkTV Host Claims Harry ‘Colluded’ With Book
Discussing Earl Spencer’s controversial memoir, O’Sullivan said: “We’re hearing that Harry, who I think colluded with this book.”
He then went further, suggesting that Harry and Meghan Markle’s return to Britain may have been deliberately connected to its publication.
“I think that the Sussexes came back to Britain; the timing of their return was specific to coincide with the publication of this book,” he said.
“They’re in this book up to here.”
O’Sullivan also criticised reports that Harry could be involved in a documentary linked to his late mother, Princess Diana.
He described the idea as Harry climbing aboard a “gravy train” and “cashing in on his mother”.
Those remarks were opinion expressed during the TalkTV discussion and were not supported in the source by confirmation from Harry.
Commentator Says Royal Conflict Has Become ‘Lucrative’
Fellow commentator Candice Holdsworth also criticised the ongoing public disputes surrounding Harry, Meghan and the wider Royal Family.
“Yeah, it’s just never-ending. It never stops,” she said.
Holdsworth argued that confrontation with the Royal Family had become financially valuable for the Sussexes.
“I think with Harry as well, they’ve realised now there’s this very lucrative model,” she said.
“They can be very adversarial towards the royal family, and they can make money out of it.”
Again, the comments reflected Holdsworth’s interpretation rather than a confirmed description of Harry and Meghan’s motives.
Earl Spencer Book Error Sparks Fresh Row
The TalkTV discussion came amid controversy surrounding Earl Spencer’s memoir Swan Song.
Spencer had claimed that Piers Morgan was editor of the Daily Mirror when photographs of Princess Diana wearing a leotard at a gym were published in 1993.
Morgan disputed the claim, pointing out that he did not become editor of the newspaper until 1995.
He subsequently threatened legal action and called for the book to be removed from sale and pulped.
Spencer later acknowledged the factual error through a representative.
The statement maintained that Spencer’s account of a separate conversation with Morgan was accurate but admitted that his assumption about Morgan’s editorial role had been wrong.
“As an historian, accuracy is important to Earl Spencer,” the statement said.
“He therefore wishes to clarify that his assumption was incorrect. Earl Spencer apologises to Mr Morgan for this error.”
Piers Morgan Demands Book Be Pulled
Despite the apology, Morgan made clear that he did not consider the matter resolved.
Speaking to the BBC, he questioned why the memoir should remain on sale after Spencer had acknowledged the mistake.
“He’s a historian. He should want it removed from the shelves,” Morgan said.
He argued that if the book was intended as a historical record, a claim now admitted to be false should not remain in circulation.
“Now you’ve admitted it’s untrue and apologised. He should pull the book,” Morgan said.
Harry Dragged Into Wider Family Controversy
The dispute over Swan Song has now widened beyond Spencer and Morgan, with TalkTV commentators using the book controversy to revive criticism of Harry and Meghan.
O’Sullivan’s suggestion that Harry helped shape the memoir or timed his return to Britain around its publication remains unverified.
Likewise, the claim that Harry is planning to “cash in” on Diana reflects the presenter’s interpretation of reported documentary plans rather than any stated intention from the Duke himself.
What is clear is that the release of Spencer’s book has reopened tensions surrounding Diana’s legacy — and once again pulled Harry into a wider debate about how the Royal Family’s past is being revisited in public.
